FREE UK DELIVERY OVER £100 MADE TO ORDER THIRD-PARTY TESTED UK BASED SUPPORT EARN WITH APEXION PARTNERS

MOTS-c vs SS-31 vs NAD+: A Research Comparison (2026)

Reviewed by Oscar Reyes, PhD, Synthesis Lead at Apexion BioLabs · Scientific review of the chemistry and analytical content

Quick answer

How do MOTS-c, SS-31 and NAD+ differ?

MOTS-c, a 16-amino-acid peptide coded by mitochondrial DNA, is studied as a metabolic messenger. SS-31, also called elamipretide, is a lab-made peptide built from four amino acids, and it latches onto cardiolipin, a lipid found only in the mitochondrial inner membrane. NAD+ is something else entirely: a coenzyme with no amino acids, carrying electrons through the cell’s energy chemistry.

  • Three targets: a signalling pathway, a membrane lipid and redox chemistry
  • Evidence ranges from mouse studies (MOTS-c) to a US-approved medicine (SS-31)
  • Swap one for another and the experiment changes, so they aren’t interchangeable

Type MOTS-c into a search bar and SS-31 and NAD+ follow close behind. UK shops sell the three as a “bioenergetic trio”, and podcast hosts talk listeners through how to stack them. It makes a tidy bundle. Look at the chemistry, though, and you find three different kinds of molecule doing three different jobs in three different places.

This guide gives each one its own profile, then lines them up by target, location and strength of evidence. It finishes with their UK and sport status and the tests that confirm a batch matches its label.

Apexion provides MOTS-c, SS-31 and NAD+ only for lab research. None is intended for humans or animals, and this guide offers general information only, with no medical advice.

MOTS-c vs SS-31 vs NAD+ at a Glance

All three act on mitochondria, each at its own level. MOTS-c sends signals, SS-31 protects the membrane folds, and NAD+ supplies the spark of electron chemistry that powers the whole system. “Signal, shield, spark” is an easy way to keep them apart, and the table fills in the detail.

MOTS-cSS-31 (elamipretide)NAD+
What it isMitochondrial-derived peptideSynthetic tetrapeptideCoenzyme (a dinucleotide)
Is it a peptide?Yes (16 amino acids)Yes (4 amino acids)No
OriginEncoded in mitochondrial DNA (the 12S rRNA region)Synthetic (a Szeto-Schiller peptide)Made in every cell from vitamin B3 precursors
Main targetAMPK and metabolic signalling; moves to the nucleus under stressCardiolipin in the inner mitochondrial membraneRedox reactions; substrate for sirtuins and PARPs
Role in one phraseA signal (“upstream”)Structural protection (“downstream”)A cofactor in the fuel chemistry
Human evidenceVery limited; first Phase 2a trial opened in 2026Clinical trials; FDA accelerated approval for Barth syndrome (2025)Mostly for the precursors (NR, NMN)
Molecular weight~2,174.6 g/mol~639.8 g/mol (free base)~663.4 g/mol

Those three weights come back later in this guide. On a COA, they’re the fastest way to tell the compounds apart.

What Is MOTS-c?

MOTS-c is a mitochondrial-derived peptide (MDP) of 16 amino acids, coded by a short stretch of the 12S rRNA gene in mitochondrial DNA. USC researchers Changhan Lee and Pinchas Cohen reported it in Cell Metabolism in 2015. Its name spells out where it comes from: the mitochondrial open reading frame of the 12S rRNA-c.

It belongs to a small family. A 2020 review by Merry and colleagues counts eight known MDPs: humanin, MOTS-c and SHLP1 through SHLP6, the small humanin-like peptides. MOTS-c is the only one of the eight coded in the 12S gene. The other seven come from the neighbouring 16S gene.

Finding it changed what scientists thought mitochondrial DNA could do. “We didn’t know that our mitochondrial DNA encoded messages to control the nucleus,” Lee told the USC Leonard Davis School of Gerontology in 2018.

Four lines of research have grown from that discovery:

  • AMPK and the folate-methionine cycle: cell experiments show MOTS-c braking the folate cycle and the purine synthesis linked to it. AMPK, the enzyme that reads a cell’s fuel levels, switches on as a result.
  • Glucose handling: skeletal muscle was the main target tissue in the 2015 mouse work, and most glucose studies since have followed it there.
  • Exercise: Reynolds and colleagues (2021, *Nature Communications*) reported MOTS-c rising 11.9-fold in skeletal muscle samples after a cycling session. The same paper reports higher physical capacity in mice aged 2, 12 and 22 months.
  • Nuclear translocation: when fuel runs short, MOTS-c enters the nucleus and helps steer nuclear genes, as Zheng and colleagues’ 2023 review describes.

What Is MOTS-c Used For in Research?

Laboratories use MOTS-c to study how mitochondria send messages across the cell. Common projects look at AMPK activation in cultured muscle cells, glucose handling in mice made insulin resistant by diet or by age, exercise adaptation in young and old mice, and gene regulation once the peptide reaches the nucleus.

The MOTS-c 40mg specification and COA page holds the batch data for the 40mg pen.

What Is SS-31 (Elamipretide)?

SS-31 (D-Arg-Dmt-Lys-Phe-NH2) is a synthetic peptide only four residues long. It crosses into cells, collects along the inner membrane of each mitochondrion and binds cardiolipin, a lipid that keeps the respiratory protein complexes in place. Its drug name is elamipretide, and older papers use Bendavia or MTP-131.

The “SS” honours Hazel Szeto and Peter Schiller, the pharmacologist and chemist behind a family of small aromatic-cationic peptides. Stealth BioTherapeutics took SS-31 into the clinic as elamipretide, and in June 2026 the company took the name Mighty Therapeutics.

Cardiolipin makes an unusually precise target. Szeto’s 2014 review in the *British Journal of Pharmacology* explains that this lipid appears only on the inner membrane, shapes the folds called cristae and decides whether cytochrome c carries electrons or turns into a peroxidase. When SS-31 binds cardiolipin, cytochrome c stays on electron duty, and lab models show fewer reactive oxygen species as a result.

Three studies show how far the research has spread:

  • Aged muscle: in Campbell 2018, eight weeks of SS-31 in 26-month-old mice restored redox balance and raised exercise tolerance with no rise in mitochondrial content. The paper’s title describes it as reversing age-related redox stress in those mice.
  • Protein partners: Chavez 2020 (*PNAS*) used cross-linking mass spectrometry to map what SS-31 touches. Every partner was a known cardiolipin binder, involved either in ATP production or in 2-oxoglutarate metabolism.
  • Kidney, heart and eye models: a 2022 review by Zhu and colleagues gathers the kidney work in rodent and cell models, which runs alongside a long record in heart and retina models.

The University of Washington group behind Campbell and Chavez is still at it. In August 2026, a joint Mighty Therapeutics and UW team won a $1 million XPRIZE Healthspan Milestone 2 award for its elamipretide research, and UW’s David Marcinek said in the announcement: “Mitochondria are a key link between molecular drivers of aging and age-related pathology.”

Why Is Barth Syndrome Important to SS-31?

In this rare inherited mitochondrial disorder, variants in the TAFAZZIN gene leave cardiolipin badly built, which makes it a direct match for a cardiolipin-binding peptide. The US FDA responded on 19 September 2025 with accelerated approval for elamipretide, sold as Forzinity, in Barth syndrome. It has no UK approval, and trial results in other conditions have been mixed.

Check the SS-31 30mg specification and COA for lot data on the 50mg pen.

What Is NAD+?

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, or NAD+, is a coenzyme present in all living cells. It ferries electrons through energy metabolism by flipping between NAD+ and NADH. Sirtuins and PARPs also use it up as they signal and repair DNA.

City of Hope biochemist Charles Brenner reaches for an electrical picture, calling NAD coenzymes “the wiring, if you will” that high-energy electrons travel along (*Pasadena Magazine*).

Its link to ageing comes from animal work showing NAD+ levels falling with age in several model organisms. Human measurements are catching up. A 2025 *Nature Metabolism* review by Vinten and colleagues notes that data on NAD+ in human tissues is still sparse, which keeps the field busy with new studies.

The finished coenzyme and its precursors are easy to confuse:

  • Precursors: niacin, nicotinamide riboside (NR) and nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) are vitamin B3 forms that cells turn into NAD+ through enzyme pathways. The bulk of human trials test NR or NMN.
  • NAD+ itself: the end product, added directly to enzyme and cell assays.

The 1000mg pen’s purity results are on the NAD+ 1000mg specification and COA page.

Is NAD+ a Peptide?

No. It’s a dinucleotide, built from two nucleotides (a nicotinamide unit and an adenine unit) bridged by a pair of phosphates. Peptides, by definition, are strings of amino acids, and NAD+ contains none. It ends up next to mitochondrial peptides since energy-metabolism labs study all of them and the same suppliers stock them.

Chemically, it has far more in common with ATP than with any peptide on the shelf. The graphic below shows how differently the three are put together.

MOTS-c as a 16-bead amino-acid chain, SS-31 as a four-bead chain and NAD+ as two nucleotide units joined by phosphates.
MOTS-c as a 16-bead amino-acid chain, SS-31 as a four-bead chain and NAD+ as two nucleotide units joined by phosphates.

What Is the Difference Between NAD and Peptides?

  • Building blocks: peptides are amino acids linked through peptide bonds. NAD+ is two sugars, two bases and two phosphates.
  • How each is made: cells build peptides on ribosomes from a genetic code, while NAD+ comes from enzyme pathways fed by vitamin B3.
  • How each is verified: a peptide’s COA confirms the mass of its sequence. An NAD+ COA confirms the dinucleotide’s mass and usually its UV absorbance at 260 nm.

What Is the Difference Between SS-31 and MOTS-c?

SS-31 is a lab-designed peptide that protects the structure of the mitochondrial membrane, while MOTS-c is a naturally coded peptide that relays signals from mitochondria out to the wider cell. Origin, size, target and depth of evidence all differ, so findings for one don’t transfer to the other.

Point by point, SS-31 vs MOTS-c looks like this:

  • Origin: MOTS-c is coded in mitochondrial DNA. SS-31 came out of a medicinal chemistry programme and doesn’t occur in nature.
  • Size and structure: at 16 standard amino acids, MOTS-c is four times the length. SS-31 stops at four, and two of them (D-arginine and dimethyltyrosine) are non-natural forms that resist enzymes.
  • Target: MOTS-c works upstream as a signal, through AMPK and the nucleus. SS-31 works downstream as structural protection, gripping cardiolipin next to the respiratory complexes.
  • Evidence: SS-31 has a US approval and several clinical trials. MOTS-c has a decade of cell and mouse work and one Phase 2a trial underway.

Those differences decide study design. A team asking how cristae keep their shape under oxidative stress reaches for SS-31. A team asking how mitochondria warn the nucleus about a fuel shortage reaches for MOTS-c.

MOTS-c vs NAD+: How Do They Differ?

MOTS-c acts as a peptide messenger, and NAD+ takes part in the energy chemistry directly. Their research overlaps because AMPK and the NAD+-dependent sirtuins influence each other in lab studies. Still, one is a peptide and the other a nucleotide-based cofactor, and their jobs differ.

Picture a building’s heating system. MOTS-c adjusts the thermostat, changing which enzymes switch on. NAD+ is closer to the water in the pipes, picking up electrons as NADH, handing them on and coming back round to collect more.

A common search asks whether NAD+ has to go with MOTS-c. The research answer is short. They’re independent molecules, nothing published shows that one needs the other to act, and no combination study of the pair has appeared in the literature.

Where Does Each One Act in the Mitochondrion?

The three work at separate addresses. SS-31 holds onto cardiolipin in the inner membrane, close to the respiratory complexes. NAD+ moves electrons around in the matrix and cytosol. MOTS-c starts in the mitochondria and travels to the nucleus when the cell comes under metabolic stress.

LocationCompoundWhat happens there
Inner membraneSS-31Binds cardiolipin next to the electron transport chain
Matrix and cytosolNAD+NAD+/NADH redox reactions, and sirtuin and PARP activity
Mitochondria → nucleusMOTS-cSignalling to the nucleus under metabolic stress

Because those addresses don’t overlap, researchers can study each layer of mitochondrial function on its own terms.

What Does the Research Show for Each?

How far each has been tested varies widely. SS-31 leads on human data, with a US approval for one rare disease. Most MOTS-c findings are preclinical, from cells and mice, and its first Phase 2a trial has been recruiting since February 2026. Human NAD+ research mainly tests NR and NMN, the precursors, with much less work on NAD+ itself.

Cell and animal studiesHuman studiesRegulatory status
MOTS-cMany (mouse metabolism, exercise)Very limited; the analogue CB4211 completed early-stage trials, and a Phase 2a study (NCT07505745) began in 2026Not approved anywhere
SS-31Many (heart, kidney, muscle and eye models; aged mice)Several clinical trials, with mixed results outside Barth syndromeUS accelerated approval for Barth syndrome only
NAD+ManyTrials of the precursors (NR, NMN); limited for NAD+ itselfPrecursors sold as food supplements

For MOTS-c, two reviews give the fullest picture. Zheng and colleagues (2023) follow the peptide from discovery through nuclear signalling. Miller and colleagues’ 2022 review in the *Journal of Clinical Investigation* places all eight MDPs in ageing research and sketches where drug development could take them.

The graphic below puts the difference in numbers, comparing how much published research and how many registered trials stand behind each compound.

Comparing the published papers and registered trials behind MOTS-c, SS-31 and NAD+.
Comparing the published papers and registered trials behind MOTS-c, SS-31 and NAD+.

Are MOTS-c, SS-31 and NAD+ Studied Together?

The three get mentioned together a lot, since each covers a separate piece of how mitochondria work, yet published combination studies are close to nonexistent. The “stack” guides online build on the logic of each mechanism. Peer-reviewed papers so far test them one at a time.

Testing the idea properly is harder, because a combination study needs separate arms to show what each compound adds. Nobody has published that design yet, so the question stays open. Our guide, peptide stacks explained, covers how combinations are handled more broadly.

Yes, for laboratory research. In the UK, MOTS-c and SS-31 may legally be bought as research materials, but as unlicensed medicines they can’t be marketed for human use or bought over the counter as treatments. Precursors of NAD+ reach shops as food supplements, and research-grade NAD+ is sold for lab use as a reagent.

  • MOTS-c: no regulator anywhere has approved it, and UK suppliers list it as a laboratory reagent.
  • SS-31: the MHRA hasn’t licensed elamipretide, so its US approval doesn’t carry over to the UK.

The wider picture is in are peptides legal in the UK, alongside our Research Use Only policy.

Are MOTS-c and SS-31 Banned in Sport?

MOTS-c is prohibited at all times, in competition or out of it. The WADA 2027 Prohibited List, published on 21 September 2026 and in force from 1 January 2027, keeps it under S4.4.1 (metabolic modulators) as an AMPK activator, the same entry it had in 2026. SS-31 isn’t named on either list.

SS-31’s position needs a closer look. WADA’s S0 class catches substances with “no current approval by any governmental regulatory health authority for human therapeutic use”. Elamipretide gained a US approval in 2025, so its status for an athlete is a question for the national agency. UKAD enforces the List in the UK and handles those queries. USADA’s MOTS-c explainer sets out why the peptide was listed.

How to Verify Research-Grade MOTS-c, SS-31 and NAD+

Begin with the batch’s own certificate of analysis (COA). The three molecules have very different masses, so the LC-MS result works as a quick identity check. A “MOTS-c” batch reading near 640, or an “SS-31” batch reading near 2,175, has been mislabelled, and the paperwork shows it straight away.

MOTS-cSS-31NAD+
Sequence or structure16 amino acids (shown in the first graphic)D-Arg-Dmt-Lys-Phe-NH2Nicotinamide and adenine nucleotides joined by a diphosphate
FormulaC101H152N28O22S2C32H49N9O5C21H27N7O14P2
Molecular weight~2,174.6 g/mol~639.8 g/mol (free base)~663.4 g/mol
CAS number1627580-64-6736992-21-553-84-9
FormPre-filled research penPre-filled research penPre-filled research pen

Run each batch through this checklist:

  1. Match the COA’s lot number to the label.
  2. Look for an HPLC purity figure with the method named.
  3. Compare the LC-MS mass with the expected value. Salt forms such as SS-31 acetate or hydrochloride can push the paper formula weight above 640.
  4. Check that the lab is named and the test is dated.
  5. Find storage guidance specific to that batch.

All three come from Apexion as pre-filled research pens, made to order in Britain and typically ≥98% HPLC-verified. Every batch has a COA covering identity, purity and batch details. A quick scan of the pen’s QR code brings it up, and the batch number works too. Apexion batch verification explains that process. How to read a peptide COA walks through each line, and the guide to verify a research peptide batch covers the follow-up checks.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are mitochondrial-derived peptides?

MDPs are small peptides read from short open reading frames inside the mitochondrial genome. Researchers know of eight: humanin, MOTS-c and the six SHLPs (small humanin-like peptides 1 to 6). They relay messages from mitochondria across the cell. Because SS-31 is synthetic, it falls outside the group even though it targets mitochondria.

Is SS-31 the same as elamipretide?

Yes. Elamipretide is the official drug name for SS-31, the Szeto-Schiller lab code for D-Arg-Dmt-Lys-Phe-NH2. Bendavia and MTP-131 are older names for the same molecule. Forzinity is the US medicine containing elamipretide HCl, while research-grade SS-31 is sold as a reagent and is a different product.

Is MOTS-c naturally produced in the body?

Yes. It’s coded by the 12S rRNA gene in mitochondrial DNA, and lab studies have found it in cells, tissue and plasma, with lower circulating levels in older samples. The research-grade version is synthesised to the same 16-residue sequence, so a COA should report a mass close to 2,175.

Is NAD+ the same as NMN or NR?

No. NR and NMN are smaller vitamin B3 compounds that cells build into NAD+, which is the end-stage coenzyme. Human trials mostly give NR or NMN; research-grade NAD+ goes straight into enzyme and cell assays. Each of the three has its own mass, so a COA separates them instantly.

Is SS-31 approved in the UK?

No. The MHRA hasn’t authorised elamipretide, and neither has the European Medicines Agency. The only approval anywhere came from the FDA in September 2025: an accelerated approval for Barth syndrome that still requires a confirmatory trial. UK laboratories can obtain SS-31 only as a research material.

How should MOTS-c, SS-31 and NAD+ be stored?

Follow the storage guidance for each batch and keep all three somewhere cool and stable, out of heat and bright light. Long-term storage is usually at −20 °C, and handling them as little as possible keeps results consistent and cuts the chance of contamination. Our peptide storage and handling guide goes into more depth.

Summing Up

These three compounds share an organelle and very little else. One is a messenger coded in mitochondrial DNA, one is a designed peptide that guards the inner membrane and one is the coenzyme that keeps electrons moving. The evidence behind them stretches from a first Phase 2a trial to a US-approved medicine, so each one answers its own research question.

Apexion supplies all three for laboratory research only. Batches and formats are listed in Apexion’s mitochondria research range.

Sources

  • Lee C, Zeng J, Drew BG, et al. The mitochondrial-derived peptide MOTS-c promotes metabolic homeostasis and reduces obesity and insulin resistance. Cell Metabolism, 2015.
  • Reynolds JC, Lai RW, Woodhead JST, et al. MOTS-c is an exercise-induced mitochondrial-encoded regulator of age-dependent physical decline and muscle homeostasis. Nature Communications, 2021.
  • Zheng Y, Wei Z, Wang T. MOTS-c: a promising mitochondrial-derived peptide for therapeutic exploitation. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 2023 (PMC9905433).
  • Szeto HH. First-in-class cardiolipin-protective compound as a therapeutic agent to restore mitochondrial bioenergetics. British Journal of Pharmacology, 2014.
  • Campbell MD, Duan J, Samuelson AT, et al. Improving mitochondrial function with SS-31 reverses age-related redox stress and improves exercise tolerance in aged mice. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 2018 (PMC6588449).
  • Chavez JD, Tang X, Campbell MD, et al. Mitochondrial protein interaction landscape of SS-31. PNAS, 2020.
  • Zhu Y, Luo M, Bai X, et al. SS-31, a mitochondria-targeting peptide, ameliorates kidney disease. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, 2022 (PMC9192202).
  • Merry TL, Chan A, Woodhead JST, et al. Mitochondrial-derived peptides in energy metabolism. American Journal of Physiology: Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2020 (PMC7750512).
  • Miller B, Kim SJ, Kumagai H, Yen K, Cohen P. Mitochondria-derived peptides in aging and healthspan. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 2022.
  • Vinten KT, Trętowicz MM, et al. NAD+ precursor supplementation in human ageing: clinical evidence and challenges. Nature Metabolism, 2025.
  • US FDA. Approval package, NDA 215244, Forzinity (elamipretide), 2025.
  • World Anti-Doping Agency. Prohibited List 2026 and Prohibited List 2027.
  • USADA. What is the MOTS-c peptide?
  • ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT07505745, MOTS-c Phase 2a study, 2026.

KLOW vs GLOW Peptide Blend: Key Differences Compared

Reviewed by Oscar Reyes, PhD, Synthesis Lead at Apexion BioLabs · Scientific review of the chemistry and analytical content

Quick answer

What is the difference between KLOW and GLOW?

GLOW is a 70mg three-peptide blend of GHK-Cu (50mg), BPC-157 (10mg) and TB-500 (10mg). KLOW is an 80mg four-peptide blend containing the same three compounds in the same amounts, plus 10mg of KPV. KPV is the only compositional difference, and it’s a tripeptide studied mainly in inflammatory-signalling research.

Key takeaways

  • Both blends share one core: GHK-Cu, BPC-157 and TB-500.
  • KLOW adds 10mg of KPV to that core.
  • GLOW 70 and KLOW 80 are named after their total milligrams.
  • Pick the blend that matches what your study measures, and check every component on the batch certificate.

Both are supplied as pre-filled research pens: the KLOW 80mg research pen and the GLOW 70mg research pen, each with a batch COA.

Below, we break down what’s in each blend, what KPV adds, what “70” and “80” mean, and how both compare with the Wolverine stack and with GHK-Cu on its own.

All compound blends are supplied for laboratory research use only and are Research Use Only.

What Is the GLOW Peptide Blend?

GLOW is a three-peptide research blend of GHK-Cu, BPC-157 and TB-500, most often supplied as 70mg: 50mg of GHK-Cu with 10mg each of BPC-157 and TB-500. Laboratories study it in models of skin structure, collagen and connective tissue, where all three compounds have their own published research.

What Is GLOW Peptide Made Of?

CompoundAmountWhat it’s studied for
GHK-Cu (glycyl-L-histidyl-L-lysine copper complex)50mgA copper-binding tripeptide studied in collagen production and tissue remodelling
BPC-157 (body protection compound-157)10mgA 15-amino-acid peptide studied in tendon, tissue and blood-vessel-formation models
TB-500 (a fragment of thymosin beta-4)10mgA short synthetic peptide studied in cell-migration research

GHK-Cu makes up about 71% of the blend by weight. That’s why GLOW is often described as a “GHK-Cu-led” formula, with the other two compounds in supporting amounts.

Why These Three Compounds Are Studied Together

Each compound reaches a different part of the same repair process. In published models, GHK-Cu is linked to collagen and matrix remodelling, BPC-157 to blood-vessel formation, and TB-500 to the way cells move into damaged tissue. Researchers combine them to look at those overlapping pathways in one model, with a single preparation. Full compound details and the batch certificate are on the GLOW 70mg research pen specification & COA page. For how blends like this compare with other common combinations, see peptide stacks explained.

What Is the KLOW Peptide Blend?

KLOW is an 80mg four-peptide research blend. It contains GLOW’s GHK-Cu (50mg), BPC-157 (10mg) and TB-500 (10mg), plus 10mg of KPV. It’s studied in the same tissue models as GLOW, with extra attention on inflammation-signalling pathways, the area where most KPV research has been done.

What Is KLOW 80?

“80” is the total number of milligrams in each pen or vial: 50 + 10 + 10 + 10. The name spells out the formula. The K stands for KPV and “LOW” comes from GLOW, so KLOW is shorthand for “GLOW with KPV”. Some suppliers print the total on the label (KLOW 80) and others leave it off, which is why the same blend can appear under both names.

KLOW Composition at a Glance

  • GHK-Cu, 50mg: the copper tripeptide from GLOW, now 62.5% of the blend
  • BPC-157, 10mg: unchanged from GLOW
  • TB-500, 10mg: unchanged from GLOW
  • KPV, 10mg: lysine-proline-valine, the last three amino acids of the hormone α-MSH

The compound list, batch number and certificate are on the KLOW 80mg research pen specification & COA page.

What Is the Difference Between KLOW and GLOW Peptide?

The difference is KPV. KLOW contains everything in GLOW at the same amounts, plus 10mg of KPV. Three things follow from that. The total rises from 70mg to 80mg, GHK-Cu’s share of the blend falls from about 71% to 62.5%, and inflammation-signalling measurements become part of what the blend is used to study. Our KPV peptide guide covers what KPV is and how it’s studied.

KLOW vs GLOW Head-to-Head Comparison

GLOWKLOW
Total content70mg80mg
Number of compounds34
GHK-Cu50mg50mg
BPC-15710mg10mg
TB-50010mg10mg
KPVnone10mg
GHK-Cu share of blend~71%~62.5%
Main research areasSkin structure, collagen, tissue-repair modelsThe same, plus inflammation-signalling models
Apexion format70mg pre-filled research pen80mg pre-filled research pen
Apexion price£175£195

GLOW and KLOW carry identical amounts of GHK-Cu, BPC-157 and TB-500, so any comparison between them comes down to KPV. KLOW costs £20 more for its extra 10mg. GLOW keeps a higher concentration of GHK-Cu, while KLOW spreads the same GHK-Cu across a larger total.

The share change has a knock-on effect in study design. Each milligram of GLOW carries about 0.71mg of GHK-Cu, and each milligram of KLOW carries 0.625mg. If two study arms are matched by total blend weight, the KLOW arm receives less GHK-Cu, BPC-157 and TB-500 than the GLOW arm. Matching by pen, or by GHK-Cu content, keeps the shared core identical and leaves KPV as the only variable.

What Does KPV Add to KLOW?

KPV (lysine-proline-valine) is the last three amino acids of alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone, or α-MSH. It’s studied mainly for its role in inflammation signalling, especially the NF-κB pathway, and in models of the gut lining and skin cells. In KLOW, it adds an inflammation-focused compound to a core built around tissue structure.

What Is KPV Peptide?

α-MSH is a 13-amino-acid hormone best known for its role in skin pigmentation. Scientists found that its tail end, the three amino acids K-P-V, kept much of the hormone’s anti-inflammatory activity on its own. A 2008 review in Endocrine Reviews by Brzoska and colleagues described KPV as keeping α-MSH’s anti-inflammatory effect while lacking its pigmentary action. That combination is the reason KPV became a research compound in its own right.

The UK has its own piece of the story. Researchers at the University of Sheffield studied KPV signalling in human keratinocytes (skin cells) in 2004, describing the tail-end tripeptides of α-MSH as “the smallest minimal sequences reported to prevent inflammation”.

KPV and NF-κB Inflammatory Signalling Research

NF-κB is a protein complex that works like a master switch inside cells, turning on genes that drive inflammation. In a 2008 Gastroenterology study, Dalmasso and colleagues reported that nanomolar concentrations of KPV inhibited NF-κB and MAP kinase signalling in human intestinal cells and immune cells. In mouse models of colitis, KPV reduced pro-inflammatory cytokine expression. A German team using two other mouse colitis models reported similar anti-inflammatory effects in the same year.

GLOW already has a foothold on this pathway. Pickart and Margolina (2018) list NF-κB among the molecules GHK is reported to suppress. KPV gives KLOW a second, more targeted compound on a pathway the core already touches.

KPV in Epithelial and Barrier Research

The same Dalmasso study showed how KPV gets into cells. It’s carried by PepT1, a transporter for small peptides that is normally found in the small intestine and appears in the colon during inflammation. That discovery shaped later work: a 2017 study in Molecular Therapy loaded KPV into hyaluronic-acid nanoparticles aimed at colon-lining cells and immune cells in mouse models.

Adding KPV lets one blend cover inflammation-signalling measurements alongside GLOW’s tissue focus. The single compound is also available as KPV 10mg.

The Shared Core: GHK-Cu, BPC-157 and TB-500

Both blends are built on the same three compounds in the same amounts. Everything in this section applies equally to KLOW and GLOW, and these three compounds account for 70mg of each pen. Each one has its own research history, stretching back to the 1970s for GHK.

GHK-Cu

GHK is a tripeptide found naturally in human plasma, saliva and urine, and its levels fall with age. It binds copper tightly, and the copper complex is the form studied in most research. A 2015 review by Pickart, Vasquez-Soltero and Margolina described GHK stimulating collagen, decorin and glycosaminoglycans in laboratory models. The same review reported that GHK can up- and down-regulate at least 4,000 human genes. There’s more background in our GHK-Cu research overview, and the single compound is listed as GHK-Cu 50mg.

BPC-157

BPC-157 is a 15-amino-acid peptide based on a sequence from a protein found in gastric juice. It’s studied in tendon, ligament, muscle and blood-vessel-formation models. A 2019 review from Loughborough University’s National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine found consistently positive results across the soft-tissue studies it examined, while noting that most were carried out in small rodent models. That rodent-led evidence base is the one researchers work from today. For how it compares with TB-500, see BPC-157 vs TB-500, or view BPC-157 10mg.

TB-500

TB-500 is a synthetic seven-amino-acid fragment (LKKTETQ) of thymosin beta-4 (Tβ4), a 43-amino-acid protein made by most cell types. Goldstein and colleagues (2012) describe Tβ4 binding to actin, the protein that forms a cell’s internal scaffolding, and promoting cell migration. The active part is small: a 2003 study found that the seven-amino-acid actin-binding sequence LKKTETQ matched the full protein’s activity in aged-mouse dermal models. That short sequence is the basis of most TB-500 research material. The single compound is available as TB-500 10mg.

KLOW 80 vs GLOW 70: What Do the Numbers Mean?

The numbers are total milligrams. GLOW 70 is GHK-Cu 50mg + BPC-157 10mg + TB-500 10mg. KLOW 80 adds KPV 10mg. The three shared compounds come in identical amounts in both blends, so the extra 10mg in KLOW is entirely KPV.

Milligrams measure weight, though, and peptides differ a lot in size. KPV weighs about 342 daltons per molecule, while BPC-157 weighs about 1,420 (PubChem). The same 10mg of KPV therefore holds roughly four times as many molecules as 10mg of BPC-157. On the label, KPV is 12.5% of KLOW. Counted in molecules, it’s closer to a sixth.

Some suppliers sell other totals, such as KLOW 70 or a 30mg GLOW, so read the amount of each component and ignore the headline number.

Is KLOW Peptide Worth It Compared With GLOW?

It depends on the research design. If a study measures inflammation signalling, KLOW includes KPV without needing a separate compound. If a study focuses only on tissue and collagen pathways, GLOW covers the same core for £20 less. The better choice is the one that matches the measurements you plan to take.

Cost Comparison

OptionWhat you getApexion price
GLOW 70mgGHK-Cu 50mg + BPC-157 10mg + TB-500 10mg£175
KLOW 80mgThe GLOW core + KPV 10mg£195
GLOW’s three compounds bought separatelyGHK-Cu 50mg (£65) + BPC-157 10mg (£65) + TB-500 10mg (£90)£220
KLOW’s four compounds bought separatelyThe above + KPV 10mg (£90)£310

KPV costs £90 as a single pen and £20 as the step from GLOW to KLOW. So a design that needs all four compounds together is cheaper as KLOW, and a design that needs KPV on its own time course is better served by the single KPV 10mg pen.

When a Single-Compound Design Makes More Sense

A blend answers a combined question. When four compounds go in together, it’s hard to say which one produced a change in a measurement. Single compounds keep each variable separate, which is the standard route for dose-response work or for testing one mechanism. Predrag Sikirić, whose University of Zagreb lab produced much of the early BPC-157 research, put the open-ended nature of this work well in a June 2026 interview with Chemistry World: “In science, you are never all done. There is always an area that still has to be investigated.”

Which Blend Fits Your Research?

Neither blend is “better” in general. Each suits a different study design, and the right pick follows from what you plan to measure. The table below matches four common designs to the blend, or single compound, that covers them without extra variables.

If your study…Choose
Measures only skin structure, collagen or tissue-remodelling pathwaysGLOW
Also measures inflammation-signalling markers such as NF-κB or cytokinesKLOW
Needs to isolate the effect of one variableSingle compounds
Leaves GHK-Cu out of the designWolverine (BPC-157 + TB-500)

The easiest way to choose is to work backwards from your endpoints. A GLOW study usually measures structural outcomes such as collagen deposition, hydroxyproline content, tube formation in blood-vessel assays or cell movement in scratch-wound assays. A KLOW study adds signalling readouts on top: NF-κB reporter activity, or cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-6 measured by ELISA. If none of your planned readouts involve inflammation, KPV adds a compound without adding data.

KLOW vs GLOW vs Wolverine Stack

The Wolverine stack is the two-compound base: BPC-157 + TB-500. GLOW adds GHK-Cu, and KLOW adds GHK-Cu plus KPV. Each blend adds one compound to the one before, so the three form a ladder. At Apexion, the steps cost £120, £175 and £195, so moving from Wolverine to GLOW adds 50mg of GHK-Cu for £55, and moving from GLOW to KLOW adds 10mg of KPV for £20.

BlendBPC-157TB-500GHK-CuKPVCompounds
Wolverine✓✓nonenone2
GLOW✓✓✓none3
KLOW✓✓✓✓4

The ladder also clears up a common mix-up. KLOW carries exactly the same BPC-157 and TB-500 as Wolverine, 10mg of each, and then adds 60mg of other compounds on top. For the two-compound option, see the BPC-157 + TB-500 20mg (Wolverine) blend, and for the pair compared head to head, BPC-157 vs TB-500.

KLOW and GLOW vs GHK-Cu Alone

GHK-Cu on its own isolates the copper-peptide variable. GLOW and KLOW study it alongside BPC-157 and TB-500, and in KLOW’s case KPV too. The choice comes down to what else goes in with it, and a single pen is the cleanest way to get a GHK-Cu-only baseline.

The single pen carries the same 50mg of GHK-Cu found in both blends. That makes a three-arm design possible: GHK-Cu alone, GLOW and KLOW. Comparing the arms shows what the copper peptide does by itself, what BPC-157 and TB-500 add to it, and what KPV adds on top.

A GHK-Cu-only design is the cleaner route for single-variable studies and for gene-expression work, where Pickart’s 4,000-gene findings give a clear starting point. At £65, GHK-Cu 50mg is also the lowest-cost way into copper-peptide research. Our GHK-Cu research overview covers the compound in more depth.

Not Every “GLOW” Is the Same Formula

The name “GLOW” is used for more than one product. Some US clinics use it for a different mixed formula of GHK-Cu, glutathione and vitamin C, which shares only one ingredient with the research blend. Supplier versions of the peptide blend also vary, from 70mg down to 30mg totals with 10mg of each compound.

Even popular online summaries quote ranges of 5 to 10mg for BPC-157 and TB-500 and 20 to 50mg for GHK-Cu. So check the component list and the milligrams of each compound on the label and certificate, and treat the product name as a starting point. (Glutathione is sold as a separate compound at Apexion.)

Pre-Filled Pen vs Vial: KLOW and GLOW Formats

KLOW and GLOW come either as freeze-dried powder in vials or as pre-filled research pens. The main differences are the preparation steps, the chance of contamination during handling, and how batches are labelled. A vial arrives as powder and a pen arrives ready.

VialPre-filled research pen
Arrives asFreeze-dried (lyophilised) powderReady-prepared in the pen
Lab preparationMixing (preparing) before measurementPrepared fresh to order before dispatch
Handling stepsMore transfers between containersFewer transfers in the lab
Batch labellingOn the vialOn the pen, tied to a batch certificate

Apexion supplies both blends as pre-filled pens, prepared to order in the UK. Each pen carries a batch number that links back to its certificate, so the record for a study arm stays tied to the exact material used. For a fuller comparison, read pre-filled pens vs vials.

How Are KLOW and GLOW Tested?

Each component of a blend should be identified and measured separately. The usual methods are HPLC (high-performance liquid chromatography) for purity and LC-MS (liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry) for identity. Testing each compound on its own confirms that all three or four are present, correct and in the amounts stated on the label.

A blend certificate should show:

  • every component by name
  • the milligrams and purity of each component
  • the batch number, matching the one on the pen or vial
  • the name of the testing laboratory
  • the test date

A certificate that gives a single purity figure for the whole blend is a warning sign. It can’t tell you whether one compound is under-filled or missing.

Mass spectrometry answers a second question for TB-500. The name is used for both the short seven-amino-acid fragment and full-length thymosin beta-4, which weigh about 889 and 4,963 daltons respectively. A measured mass shows which one is in the batch. Our guides explain how to read a peptide COA and how to verify a research peptide batch, and Apexion batch verification lets you check a batch number against its certificate.

Storage and Handling of Peptide Blends

Blends need the same care as single peptides, with one extra reason: every compound in the mix has to stay stable at the same time. Standard lab practice:

  • Store cold, with long-term storage typically at −20 °C.
  • Keep away from light and heat.
  • Avoid repeated freezing and thawing.
  • Log the date each pen or vial is opened, next to its batch number.
  • Keep blends and single compounds in clearly separated, labelled storage, since GLOW, KLOW and GHK-Cu pens share several of the same compound names.

Our guide to peptide storage and handling covers temperatures and logging in more detail.

In the UK, KLOW and GLOW are sold as research materials only. None of their components are licensed medicines. BPC-157 and TB-500 are on the WADA list of substances banned in sport, so labs that work with athletes or sports bodies need to keep that in view.

UK law decides whether a product is a medicine by how it’s presented and used. Under the Human Medicines Regulations 2012, anything sold with claims about treating or preventing disease in people counts as a medicinal product and needs a licence. Research blends are sold with compound identity, purity and batch data only, which keeps them in the research-materials category.

The WADA 2026 Prohibited List names BPC-157 under section S0 (non-approved substances) and “Thymosin-ß4 and its derivatives e.g. TB-500” under section S2. Both bans apply at all times, in and out of competition.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between KLOW and GLOW?

KLOW contains a fourth peptide, KPV, and GLOW doesn’t. Both blends share GHK-Cu (50mg), BPC-157 (10mg) and TB-500 (10mg) in identical amounts. KLOW adds 10mg of KPV, bringing the total from 70mg to 80mg and adding inflammation-signalling research to the blend’s scope.

Is KLOW the same as GLOW with KPV added?

Yes. KLOW uses the same three-compound core as GLOW in the same amounts: 50mg of GHK-Cu, 10mg of BPC-157 and 10mg of TB-500. The only addition is 10mg of KPV, which is why the name swaps GLOW’s G for a K. The extra 10mg lifts the total from 70mg to 80mg and lowers GHK-Cu’s share of the blend from about 71% to 62.5%.

What does KLOW 80 mean?

KLOW 80 means the blend contains 80mg in total. That total is made up of 50mg of GHK-Cu, 10mg of BPC-157, 10mg of TB-500 and 10mg of KPV. Some suppliers sell other totals under the same name, so check the milligrams of each compound on the label.

Is KLOW the same as the Wolverine stack?

No. The Wolverine stack contains only BPC-157 and TB-500, usually 10mg of each for 20mg in total. KLOW includes those same two compounds and adds GHK-Cu (50mg) and KPV (10mg), making it a four-peptide, 80mg blend. At Apexion, Wolverine is a 20mg pen at £120 and KLOW is an 80mg pen at £195.

Can KLOW and GLOW be compared in the same study?

Yes. Because the two blends share an identical core, a study can run them side by side and treat KPV as the single variable. Any difference in inflammation-signalling measurements between the two groups can then be linked to the added KPV. Matching the arms by pen, and not by total milligrams, keeps the GHK-Cu, BPC-157 and TB-500 content the same in both.

Where can I get KLOW and GLOW research blends?

Apexion Biolabs supplies both as pre-filled research pens, prepared to order in the UK, with batch documentation and tracked UK delivery. GLOW 70mg is £175 and KLOW 80mg is £195. Both are sold for laboratory research use only and are Research Use Only.

KLOW vs GLOW: The Bottom Line

KLOW and GLOW share the same three-peptide core, and the one difference is 10mg of KPV. Choose GLOW for tissue and collagen designs, KLOW when inflammation signalling is part of what you measure, and single compounds when one variable needs to stand alone. Then check the amount of every component on the batch certificate.

See all Apexion research blends. All Apexion research peptide pens are for laboratory research use only and are Research Use Only.

WhatsApp us